# Design revision review packet

Original blank template. Tool-neutral proposal, not a BoardRepo feature or completed review. Keep populated confidential records in the authorized workspace. Public examples must use an owned, publishable design.

## Identity and access

- Project:
- Hardware revision marking, if applicable:
- Baseline source identifier:
- Candidate source identifier:
- Permitted baseline/candidate locations:
- Version selected when the reviewer opened the link:
- Editor role:
- Reviewer role:
- Access scope and intended end date:
- Required tool/plugin versions and prerequisites:

## Intent and context

- Intended change:
- Important properties expected to remain unchanged:
- Known exclusions / unresolved assumptions:
- Relevant schematic sheets, PCB areas and interface references:
- Included source files and project-local dependencies:
- Export/check provenance: source identifier, tool/version, generation time:
- Rights / original-project attribution when publicly shared:

## Observations

- Required rendered/comparison data available: yes / no / not checked
- Reviewer inspected the intended candidate: yes / no / not checked
- Visual findings: link to findings log
- Checks actually run and their scope:
- Checks not run / limitations:
- Firmware / mechanical / manufacturing assumptions needing another owner:

## Disposition and continuation

- Decision: changes requested / accepted for stated scope / not reviewed
- Decision date and reviewer:
- Candidate identifier to which the decision applies:
- Outstanding findings and responsible owner:
- Next candidate identity, if revised:
- Source identity opened when continuing in KiCad:
- Follow-up required after later changes:

This record does not certify electrical safety, manufacturability or product compliance.